Your health scores are lagging indicators
Most SaaS health scores are built on login frequency and ticket count. By the time those turn red, the customer has already mentally churned. Predictive models identify risk 30–60 days earlier.
SaaS revenue is a compounding system. Win rate, onboarding completion, feature adoption, expansion triggers, renewal timing — every one of these data points sits in your product analytics, your CRM, and your billing platform. The problem isn’t lack of data. It’s the inability to synthesise it in time to act.
Your customer success team manages 80 accounts each. They can’t read every product session, every support ticket, every billing anomaly, and every NPS score for every account simultaneously. A unified AI health model can.
The same principle applies to expansion. Every one of your accounts has a next-logical-step. AI surfaces all of them — ranked by deal size and probability — before the customer has even asked.
Acquiring a new customer costs 5–7× more than retaining an existing one. Yet most B2B SaaS businesses invest the majority of their growth budget in acquisition, while retention runs on an under-resourced CS team and a health score that’s one spreadsheet away from being useless.
As your account base grows, individual attention per account shrinks. Expansion opportunities get missed. At-risk accounts get identified too late. NRR stagnates.
Most SaaS health scores are built on login frequency and ticket count. By the time those turn red, the customer has already mentally churned. Predictive models identify risk 30–60 days earlier.
With 60–100 accounts per CSM, proactive outreach is rationed by gut feel. The quiet accounts get no attention until too late.
Upsells happen at renewal and when customers ask. An expansion agent surfaces upgrade triggers continuously — based on usage, team size changes, feature adoption gaps.
Every new customer gets the same sequence regardless of use case or activation risk. Time-to-value is inconsistent.
Product in Mixpanel. CRM in HubSpot. Billing in Stripe. Support in Intercom. No single view of the customer.
Every play targets a specific revenue lever. Most clients build the health score first, then expand to the expansion agent.
We pull from product analytics, CRM, billing, and support to build a single predictive health score for every account — updated in real time, visible in HubSpot or Salesforce. Trained on your historical churn patterns.
A continuous expansion intelligence layer that monitors account usage, team growth signals, feature adoption gaps, and CRM notes to surface a weekly prioritised pipeline of expansion opportunities.
Onboarding sequences that adapt to the customer's use case, role, and activation behaviour. Enterprise customers with low early-session depth get automatic intervention. Power users get fast-tracked.
We map your data sources, CRM architecture, and current health scoring logic. We identify the highest-ROI first build.
Predictive model trained on your historical churn data. CRM integration. Workflow automation for at-risk account alerts.
Model live in your CRM. CSM workflow updated. First weekly reports generated. Calibration period to tune thresholds.
Monthly model retraining with new data. Quarterly review of intervention effectiveness. Expansion agent layered when ready.
We built the health score model and deployed it in about 8 weeks. In the next quarter our churn dropped significantly — not because we were doing anything dramatically different, but because we were doing the same interventions earlier, on the right accounts.
At minimum, product event data (any analytics platform), CRM activity (HubSpot, Salesforce), and billing data (Stripe, Recurly, Chargebee). Support data adds precision but isn't required to start.
Typically 6–8 weeks from discovery to live deployment, including data integration, model training, and testing. The first version is built to be refined — it improves with every 30-day cycle.
Yes. HubSpot is our default CRM integration. Scores surface as a custom contact/company property, updated automatically. High-risk accounts trigger workflows.
We typically start with clients at £1M+ ARR with at least 30–40 paying accounts. Below that, volume doesn't justify the infrastructure.
Yes. We've integrated with both, and can feed signals into either platform. Clients often find Zinerge models produce more accurate scores than built-in scoring.
A 30-minute fit call gives us enough to tell you whether your current data stack can support a predictive health model — and what the first 90 days would look like.